President Barack Obama
Win McNamee/Getty Images
One week after President Obama's much-touted speech on national security, many experts are more confused than ever about what rules govern the U.S. government's overseas killing program and where those rules apply. While the speech left many viewers with the impression that Obama planned to reform or even end this program, his administration's practices tell a different story. On Wednesday, anonymous Pakistan security officials said that a CIA drone strike had killed the Pakistani Taliban's deputy leader, Wali ur-Rehman, in North Waziristan. A pair of additional reported strikes in Yemen ? both officially unconfirmed by the U.S. ? raise even more questions about how and why the American government kills people in other countries.
The White House released a factsheet in connection with Obama's speech with the stated intention of offering clarity about the highly-debated drone program. The factsheet outlines a series of requirements before the U.S. orders a drone strike: Most notably, targets must "pose a continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons" (a standard that is itself a subject of debate); capture and other alternatives have to be ruled out as feasible options at the time of the operation; and the U.S. "respects national sovereignty and international law." Critics have noted, however, that these limitations only apply to areas outside the United States and outside "areas of active hostilities"?? and the key question of what the U.S. defines as an area of active hostilities remains entirely unclear.
The New York Times' Mark Mazzetti reports that parts of Pakistan do not, in fact, fall under the administration's new rules, at least as long as U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan. The centrality of Pakistan to the U.S. drone program ? 317 strikes have been carried out there under Obama's watch, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism ? means that this is a very big exception. Meanwhile, those hoping that Obama's speech would usher in a new era of transparency were disappointed by Press Secretary Jay Carney's flat refusal to confirm the widely reported drone strike in Pakistan.
So what rules, if any, do apply to U.S. drone killings in Pakistan? "We still don't know what rules apply to CIA strikes within 'active hostilities,' which seems to include the AfPak border," says Naureen Shah, lecturer-in-law at Columbia Law School. "What's troubling is that the CIA has never yet confirmed that it considers itself bound by international law, and it hasn't explained its standards for preventing civilian deaths." (The CIA currently operates the drone program in Pakistan, while the Department of Defense and CIA have parallel programs in Yemen.)
Morton H. Halperin, senior advisor at the Open Society Policy Foundations, echoes these concerns. "There is a general perception after President Obama's speech that drone strikes would face significant restrictions," says Halperin. "That's optimistic. As we're hearing, the new rules may not apply to Pakistan ? and a careful look at the speech shows the new rules remain vague and, in fact, keep too many options open for the President to use lethal force abroad."
Details are even more murky on the strikes in Yemen. According to freelance journalist Adam Baron, the first strike after Obama's speech, in northern Yemen, hit an empty car instead of the high level al Qaeda official who was apparently being targeted. Gregory Johnsen, a Yemen expert who follows counter-terrorism issues closely, says that although it's unclear whether the strike was from a drone or another weapons platform ? or even whether it was carried out by the U.S., Saudi Arabia or Yemen ? it seems to him like a continuation of previous policies. "For me, this is an example of President Obama wanting to score political points by posturing while leaving the same policies in place," says Johnsen. He compares this to Obama's statements in favor of closing the prison at Guantanamo, while leaving indefinite detention in place: "He's doing something similar on drones. He's arguing about a symbol, not the substance."
If all of this seems impossibly convoluted, rest assured that even those tasked with making sense of these policies have lately been mistaken. The New York Times claimed in an editorial published immediately after the speech ? and implied in a news story ? that the speech heralded the end of "signature strikes," wherein the identity of the target is unknown, but their activity suggests militancy. Those claims are simply inaccurate. As The Times later reported, signature strikes will continue in Pakistan. (The newspaper's editorial board director, Andy Rosenthal, to his credit, acknowledged the mistake.)
The source of the confusion appears to rest on the definition of "area of hostilities." Perhaps signature strikes aren't allowed in some places ? but if they are allowed in Pakistan, where else are they allowed? Are there places where the U.S. is currently operating a killing program that are considered outside an area of hostilities? And if the entire world is a battlefield ? a mantra from the Bush years that seems increasingly applicable under Obama ? what good is it to have rules that only apply to non-hostility zones?
To read the new issue of Rolling Stone online, plus the entire RS archive: Click Here
Source: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/questions-still-surround-americas-drone-program-20130530
Espn Bracket First Day Of Spring 2013 Suki Waterhouse Bates Motel Michelle Shocked ncaa bracket bracket
Massachusetts?became one of the first states to take a stand on the issue when it filed a bill on January 18 that?would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance in the event that a firearm is used to injure. Policy makers explained that such insurance policies would give those harmed by a weapon a legal recourse, and would also encourage gun owners to take precautions and undergo training ? as lower insurance rates could be offered for those who agree to take firearms training courses and properly store their weapons. The critics argue that the bill makes little sense in that it targets people who buy the weapons legally rather than those who illegally possess them.![[ Back to EurekAlert! ]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sX1YpXQiUF39gARQzd4WsIjDMO6ziceHZ2FIbTUwTc2pfGsl3blXS1jKjFiOSB_dgyDEU1teCEMuhO_OKDE34r7UO8JLz0XRHQ6tXcshA=s0-d){kind=small}
Public release date: 28-May-2013
Share ] 
Skyscaper launched last year as a pretty straightforward blog advertising service with a focus on helping bloggers make money through direct ad sales. That’s still a main part of its business and the service is currently serving up over 1.5 million ads every day, but as its co-founder Paul Burger told me last week, the company’s focus is slowly shifting to becoming a full-service blog monetization service that “covers all bases.” Until today, Skyscraper was only available as a closed beta, but it’s now open for all. Today, Skyscaper is also launching its integration with VigLink, a service that helps publishers turn their links to retailers into affiliate links without the need to sign up for all oft he 30,000 retailers the service currently supports. Thanks to the partnership between the two services, turning this service on will just take a few clicks for existing Skyscraper users. As Burger noted when I talked to him, this is just a first step in Skyscraper’s shift to offering a broader range of services. The team, which has now grown to four after the company raised a $500,000 seed round last year (and added a few vowels to its name in the process), realized that while direct ad sales are important for independent publishers, most use a variety of methods to monetize their sites. To do so, most use a multitude of services and constantly switch back and forth between them. In the long run, Skyscraper wants to become a dashboard for all of these services as it expands its offerings. One area Skyscraper is thinking about beside the VigLink integration, for example, is sponsored posts. With today’s launch, Skyscraper is also making its new WordPress plugin available for download, which will make it even easier for the vast majority of bloggers to get started on the service. One nifty feature of the plugin is that it doesn’t just make the integration easier, but that it also installs a widgetized version of Skyscraper’s media kit that bloggers can use on their “Advertise Here” pages to funnel potential ad clients directly to Skyscraper.
